The National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM) has published the oral testimony presented by its president and CEO, John Mlynczak, before the Section 301 Committee of the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in Washington, D.C.
In his remarks, Mlynczak highlighted the impact of tariffs on American businesses, music education, and musical instrument consumers, reinforcing the arguments and data previously presented by NAMM in its written comments.
The USTR selected 151 associations and companies to provide in-person testimony in support of the 811 written comments received. NAMM participated alongside other major associations such as the Consumer Technology Association, Consumer Brands Association, and United Auto Workers Association, among others.
During his testimony, Mlynczak emphasized the unintended consequences of current tariff policies on the US music products industry, especially as the Administration considers new measures under Section 301 authority. NAMM continues to advocate for evidence-based trade solutions that do not disproportionately harm American manufacturers, distributors, and students.
Tariffs are tilting the playing field against American businesses and the millions of students who rely on affordable access to musical instruments. The industry depends on a global supply chain built over generations. Policies that increase costs without expanding domestic manufacturing capacity ultimately reduce participation in music education and weaken long-term US competitiveness, stated Mlynczak.
NAMM actions regarding the Section 301 investigations
The Administration has indicated that it may use the results of the Section 301 investigations into 16 countries related to structural excess capacity and production to restore tariff levels previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
NAMM submitted formal comments on April 15 requesting that the USTR ensure any trade measures are carefully calibrated to the practices under investigation and do not create collateral harm for an industry that depends on open global trade to serve American students, schools, and musicians.
Subsequently, NAMM submitted oral testimony on April 28 and appeared at the Section 301 excess capacity hearing on May 8, outlining the industry’s concerns and responding to questions from the USTR committee.
Following the hearings held from May 5 to 8, the USTR is expected to propose specific measures, opening a second public comment period. NAMM will continue participating actively throughout the process and will notify its members when a new opportunity to provide comments becomes available.
Key messages from NAMM’s testimony
In his remarks, Mlynczak highlighted that:
- The US music products industry represents $9 billion within a global market valued at $19.5 billion, with NAMM representing more than 10,000 companies.
- Global supply chains for musical instruments depend on specialized materials and craftsmanship that cannot easily be replicated in the United States.
- Tariffs are increasing costs for American manufacturers while giving foreign competitors pricing advantages.
- Entry-level instruments — essential for music education — are being affected, with imports of wind instruments down 27% and pianos down 20% during 2025.
- Reduced access to entry-level instruments threatens the pipeline that sustains US manufacturing of professional instruments and the broader music ecosystem.
NAMM is requesting that the USTR implement a tariff exclusion process for musical instruments, components, and materials included under HTS Chapter 92 should new tariffs ultimately be approved.
Music education and music-making are fundamental to American culture and the country’s economic vitality. We respectfully ask policymakers to ensure that trade measures support — rather than hinder — the students, businesses, and communities that drive this industry, added Mlynczak.
